The impact of facial pattern on esthetic evaluation of cheek size

O impacto do padrão facial na avaliação estética do tamanho das bochechas

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-3292-24H14

Resumo

This research evaluate the facial esthetic related to cheek size changes in vertical facial patterns. The sample included 18 images of three female models with brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial patterns. Frontal facial photographs were taken at rest and smiling, and modified simulating bichectomy or cheek augmentation. A total of 76 evaluators were invited, including laypersons (LP) (n=25), professionals with experience in facial harmonization (HOFp) (n=25) and orthodontists (n=26), to judge the attractiveness of the face according to the Likert scale. The Kruskal-Wallis test for the evaluators and the Friedman test for the cheeks changes at a significance level (p<0.05) were used. In the brachyfacial pattern, resting photography with bichectomy simulation was preferred by HOFp and LP. According to LP, there is a tendency to assign higher grades to the brachyfacial smile photo, regardless of the alteration. In the mesofacial pattern, cheek augmentation, original and reduction, at rest and smiling, were similarly evaluated by the 3 groups. In the dolichofacial pattern, LP gave higher scores than orthodontists for all cheek changes in smile photographs. It is concluded that  facial esthetic in relation to cheek size in the different vertical facial patterns was assessed differently by orthodontists, HOFp and LP. However, it was not possible to identify a preferred size (original, -6mm or +6mm) for each facial pattern. The clinical relevance of this study is related to the orientation of patients in making decisions about the treatment plan, including aesthetics and multidisciplinarity, considering the facial pattern and the patient's opinion.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AHARI UZ, ESLAMI H, FALSAFI P, BAHRAMIAN A, MALEKI S. The buccal fat pad: importance and function. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, v. 12, n. 6, p. 79-81. 2016 https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-15060137981

BRAZ AV, SAKUMA TH. Midface rejuvenation: an innovative technique to restore cheek volume. Dermatol Surg., v, 38, n. 1, p. 118-120. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02161.x

CAI LZ, KWONG JW, AZAD AD, KAHN D, LEE GK, NAZERALI RS. Where Do We Look? Assessing Gaze Patterns in Cosmetic Face-Lift Surgery with Eye Tracking Technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. v, 144, n. 1, p. 63-70. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005700

COLEMAN SR, GROVER R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J., v. 26, n. 1S, p. 4-9. 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012

FENG J, YU H, YIN Y, et al. Esthetic evaluation of facial cheek volume: A study using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod., v. 89, n. 1, p. 129-137. 2019 https://doi.org/10.2319/020418-97.1

FÖRSCH M, KRULL L, HECHTNER M, RAHIMI R, WRIEDT S, WEHRBEIN H, JACOBS C, JACOBS C. Perception of esthetic orthodontic appliances: An eye tracking and cross-sectional study. Angle Orthod., v. 90, n. 1, p. 109-117. 2020 https://doi.org/10.2319/031419-198.1

GODINHO J, GONÇALVES RP, JARDIM L. Contribution of facial components to the attractiveness of the smiling face in male and female patients: A cross-sectional correlation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 157, n. 1, p. 98-104. 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.01.022

HONN M, DIETZ K, GODT A, GOZ G. Perceived relative attractivenessof facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies. J Orofac Orthop., v. 66, p. 87-96. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-005-0445-0

IBÁÑEZ-BERGANZA M, AMICO A, LORETO V. Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness. Sci Rep., v. 9, n. 1, p. 8364. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44655-9

JØRNUNG J, FARDAL Ø. Perceptions of patients' smiles: a comparison of patients' and dentists' opinions. J Am Dent Assoc., v. 138, n. 12, p 1544-53. 2007 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0103

KAWASHIMA, Y., KURE, K., & ARAI, K. Cephalometric characteristics of postorthodontic female patients with attractive and unattractive frontal posed smiles. Angle Orthod., v. 88, n. 6, p. 797–805. 2018 https://doi.org/10.2319/092017-631.1

KUROSUMI M, MIZUKOSHI K. Principal component analysis of three-dimensional face shape: Identifying shape features that change with age. Skin Res Technol., v. 24, n. 2, p. 213-222. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12416

LIMA APB, CONTI ACCF, FILHO LC, CARDOSO MA, ALMEIDA-PEDRIN RR. Influence of facial pattern in smile attractiveness regarding gingival exposure assessed by dentists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v.155, n. 2, p. 224-233. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.026

LIN F, REN M, YAO L, HE Y, GUO J, YE Q. Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics regulates motivation to seek orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 150, n. 3, p. 476-82. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.024

MATOULA S, PANCHERZ H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod., v. 76, n. 2, p. 204-10. 2006 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0204:SMOAAN]2.0.CO;2

OH, H. S., KORN, E. L., ZHANG, X., LIU, Y., XU, T., BOYD, R., BAUMRIND, S. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 136, n. 6, p. 762.e1–762.e14. 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.020

REIS SAB, ABRÃO J, CAPELOZZA LF, CLARO CAA. Evaluation of the determinants of facial profile aesthetics. Dent Press Ortod Ortop Facial, v. 16, n. 1, p. 57-67. 2011

SARVER DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 148, p. 380-6. 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030

SHAFIEE R, KORN EL, PEARSON H, BOYD RL, BAUMRIND S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 133, n. 4, p. 500-508. 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.048

STEVÃO ELL. Bichectomy or Bichatectomy - A Small and Simple Intraoral Surgical Procedure with Great Facial Results. Adv Dent and Oral Health., v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-4. 2015 https://doi.org/10.19080/ADOH.2015.01.555555

TAUB AF. Cheek augmentation improves feelings of facial attractiveness. J Drugs Dermatol., v. 11, n. 9, p. 1077-80. 2012

YEHEZKEL S, TURLEY PK. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., v. 125, p. 407-17. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.007

ZANGER SE, RAMOS AL, CUOGHI A, MENDONÇA MR, SUGUINO R. Perception of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Angle Orthod., v. 81, p. 86-90. 2012 https://doi.org/10.2319/031210-145.1

Downloads

Publicado

2024-05-01

Como Citar

Pizzurno, L. G. D. A. ., Fernandes , T. F. ., Oltramari , P. P., Conti , A. C. F. de C., Almeida , M. R. de ., & Almeida-Pedrin, R. . (2024). The impact of facial pattern on esthetic evaluation of cheek size: O impacto do padrão facial na avaliação estética do tamanho das bochechas. Concilium, 24(8), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-3292-24H14

Edição

Seção

Artigos